Problem-Solving among Math Anxious Individuals: The Role of Advanced Strategy and Testing of Online Anxiety

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

  •   Sarit Ashkenazi

  •   Hagar Eisner

Abstract

Math anxiety (MA) is negatively associated with math performance. To explore the role of online or stable MA in advanced strategy use, 52 college students solved verbal multiple-choice mathematical problems. MA was negatively related to advanced strategy use. Online anxiety and advanced strategy use were unique predictors of accuracy. Using mediation analysis, we discovered that advanced strategy uses partially mediated the relation between MA and math performance. The results show that the selection of a non-advanced strategy is one of the cognitive processes that explained the negative relation between MA and performance, and that MA has a strong contextual component.


Keywords: Math Anxiety, Mathematical Problem, Online Math Anxiety, Problem-Solving, Strategy Selection.

References

Ashcraft, M. (1995). Cognitive psychology and simple arithmetic: A review and summary of new directions. Mathematical Cognition, 1(March), 3–34.

Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math Anxiety: Personal, Educational, and Cognitive Consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00196

Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.224

Ashcraft, M. H., Kirk, E. P., & Hopko, D. R. (1998). On the cognitive consequences of mathematics anxiety. The Development of Mathematical Skills, (JANUARY 2000), 175–196.

Ashkenazi, S., & Najjar, D. (2018). Non-adaptive strategy selection in adults with high mathematical anxiety. Scientific Reports, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27763-w

Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2005). When high-powered people fail: Working memory and “Choking under pressure” in math. Psychological Science, 16(2), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00789.x

Beilock, S. L., & DeCaro, M. S. (2007). From Poor Performance to Success Under Stress: Working Memory, Strategy Selection, and Mathematical Problem Solving Under Pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 33(6), 983–998. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.983

Beilock, S. L., & Gray, R. (2012). Why Do Athletes Choke Under Pressure? In Handbook of Sport Psychology: Third Edition (pp. 425–444). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118270011.ch19

Beilock, S. L., Holt, L. E., Kulp, C. A., & Carr, T. H. (2004). More on the fragility of performance: Choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 584–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.584

Bieg, M., Goetz, T., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2014). What students think they feel differs from what they really feel - Academic self-concept moderates the discrepancy between students’ trait and state emotional self-reports. PLoS ONE, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092563

Bieg, M., Goetz, T., Wolter, I., & Hall, N. C. (2015). Gender stereotype endorsement differentially predicts girls’ and boys’ trait-state discrepancy in math anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01404

Buehler, R., & McFarland, C. (2001). Intensity bias in affective forecasting: The role of temporal focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1480–1493. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711009

Carey, E., Hill, F., Devine, A., & Szücs, D. (2016). The chicken or the egg? The direction of the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(JAN), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01987

Caviola, S., Carey, E., Mammarella, I. C., & Szucs, D. (2017). Stress, time pressure, strategy selection and math anxiety in mathematics: A review of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01488

Cipora, K., Hohol, M., Nuerk, H. C., Willmes, K., Brożek, B., Kucharzyk, B., & Nęcka, E. (2016). Professional mathematicians differ from controls in their spatial-numerical associations. Psychological Research, 80(4), 710–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0677-6

Crooks, N. M., McNeil, N. M., Taatgen, N. A., & Rijn, H. Van. (2009). Increased practice with ’set’problems hinders performance on the water jar task. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2009), 643–648. Retrieved from http://philpapers.org/rec/CROIPW

Dietrich, J. F., Huber, S., Moeller, K., & Klein, E. (2015). The influence of math anxiety on symbolic and non-symbolic magnitude processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01621

Douglas, H. P., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2018). Exploring the influence of basic cognitive skills on the relation between math performance and math anxiety. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 3(3), 642–666. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v3i3.113

Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336

Ferguson, A. M., Maloney, E. A., Fugelsang, J., & Risko, E. F. (2015). On the relation between math and spatial ability The case of math anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 1–12.

Georges, C., Hoffmann, D., & Schiltz, C. (2016). How math anxiety relates to number-space associations. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(SEP). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01401

Gimmig, D., Huguet, P., Caverni, J. P., & Cury, F. (2006). Choking under pressure and working memory capacity: When performance pressure reduces fluid intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(6), 1005–1010. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213916

Hembree, R. (1990). The Nature , Effects , and Relief of Mathematics Anxiety Authors ( s ): Ray Hembree Published by : National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/749455 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this art, 21(1), 33–46.

Imbo, I., & Vandierendonck, A. (2007). The development of strategy use in elementary school children: Working memory and individual differences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96(4), 284–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.09.001

Lemaire, P., & Siegler, R. S. (1995). Four Aspects of Strategic Change: Contributions to Children’s Learning of Multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.83

Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. (J. F. Dashiell, Ed.). The American Psychological Association, inc.

Ma, X. (1999). A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Anxiety toward Mathematics and Achievement in Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 520–540.

Maloney, E. A., Ansari, D., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2011). The effect of mathematics anxiety on the processing of numerical magnitude. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.533278

Maloney, E. A., Risko, E. F., Ansari, D., & Fugelsang, J. (2010). Mathematics anxiety affects counting but not subitizing during visual enumeration. Cognition, 114(2), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.013

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734

Orbach, L., Herzog, M., & Fritz, A. (2019). Relation of state-and trait-math anxiety to intelligence, math achievement and learning motivation. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 5(3), 371–399. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v5i3.204

Ramirez, G., Chang, H., Maloney, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). On the relationship between math anxiety and math achievement in early elementary school: The role of problem solving strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.014

Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1971). THE MATHEMATICS ANXIETY RATING SCALE : PSYCHOMETRIC DATA, 18(6), 6–9.

Si, J., Li, H., Sun, Y., Xu, Y., & Sun, Y. (2016). Age-related differences of individuals’ arithmetic strategy utilization with different level of math anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(OCT), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01612

Siegler, R. S. (1999). Strategic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(11), 430–435.

Trezise, K., & Reeve, R. A. (2018). Patterns of anxiety in algebraic problem solving: A three-step latent variable analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 66, 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.007

Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00355.x

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Ashkenazi, S., & Eisner, H. (2022). Problem-Solving among Math Anxious Individuals: The Role of Advanced Strategy and Testing of Online Anxiety. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(4), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.4.311

Most read articles by the same author(s)