Bamidele Olumilua University of Education, Science and Technology, Nigeria
* Corresponding author
Bamidele Olumilua University of Education, Science and Technology, Nigeria

Article Main Content

This research work studied the acquisition of participle forms of verb by selected nursery and primary school pupils in Ekiti State Nigeria. The study was set out to find out how Yoruba ESL pupils show variability in their realization of inflectional morphology of English verb participle forms and to explain how the morphosyntactic features of the L1 and L2 interact to affect the learners’ acquisition of English participle inflectional morphemes. One hundred (100) pupils were selected at random from five public primary schools. It was revealed from the findings that pupils have little know of participle form of verb inflections. Findings show that of all the verb inflections of participle form by pupils, 0nly 37% was correctly used and 63% was misused. Out of the 63% misused, 31% was a misuse of –ing form, 6% was a misuse of –ed form and 26% was a misuse of –en form. Pupils mostly overgeneralized rules of regular verbs for irregular verbs. From the research data, pupils misuse past –ed for –en and –en for –ed. The findings revealed that the pupils often exhibit variability with respect to the realization of verb-participle inflectional morphemes by either making wrong substitution of a particular kind of inflection for another or omitting inflections outrightly.

References

  1. Abdulkarim (2008). English errors and Chinese learners. Sunway college journal, 1, 83–97.
     Google Scholar
  2. Ayoola, M.O. & Bankole, M.A. (2017). A study of the teachers and parents’ perceptions of the use of English as the sole medium of instruction in Nigerian Nursery and Primary Schools. EKSU Studies in Language and Literature (5)1. 149–156.
     Google Scholar
  3. Brown, H. Douglas, and Susan, T. Gonzo. (2006) Readings on Second Language Acquisition. World Publishing Company.
     Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use.: Praeger.
     Google Scholar
  5. Clahsen, H. (1980). Psycholinguistic aspects of L2 acquisition: word-order phenomena in foreign workers’ interlanguage. In Felix S. ed Second language development. Trends and issues. Tübingen: Narr, 57–79.
     Google Scholar
  6. Dulay, H. & Burt, M. (1974). ‘Natural sequences in child second language acquisition’. Language Learning, 24, 37–53.
     Google Scholar
  7. Goad, H., & White, L. (2006). Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second language research,22,3, 243-268.doi:10.1191/0267658306sr268oa, http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr268oa.
     Google Scholar
  8. Hoque, M. E. (2021). The universal grammar theory: Noam Chomsky’s contribution to second language (SL) education. The Journal of EFL Education and Research 6, 2.
     Google Scholar
  9. Hsieh, F (2003). The acquisition of English agreement/tense morphology and copula be by L1Chineses speaking learners. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/events/laelpgconference/papers/v03/Hsieh.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  10. Kirkpatrick, B. (2009) Correct English. Geddes and Grossest.
     Google Scholar
  11. Lardiere, D. (2003). Second language knowledge of [+past] vs. [+finite]. In Juana, M., Liceras et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 176–189.
     Google Scholar
  12. Lardiere, D. & Schwartz, B. D. (1997). ‘Feature-marking in the L2 development of de-verbal compounds’. Journal of Linguistics, 33, 325–353.
     Google Scholar
  13. Legendre, G (2006). Early child grammars: qualitative and quantitative analysis of morphosyntactic production. Cognitive Science 30, 803–835.
     Google Scholar
  14. Muftah, M.Y.A & Eng, W.B. (2011). The acquisition of English be auxiliary and thematic verb constructions by adult Arab ESL Learners. International Journal of English Linguistics. 1, (2).
     Google Scholar
  15. Prévost, P. & L. White. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103133. [Online]Available: http://chss.pknu.ac.kr/~shpark/papers/Philippe%20Prevost_Lydia%20White.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  16. Schumann, J. H. (1978). The pidginization process: a model for second language acquisition. Newbury House Publishers.
     Google Scholar
  17. White, L. (2010). Second language acquisition at the interfaces. Lingua, 121, 577–590.
     Google Scholar
  18. Vainikka, A. & Young-Scholten, M. (1996). ‘The early stage of adult L2 syntax: additional evidence from Romance speakers. Second Language Research 12, 140–176.
     Google Scholar