Research Article

Effectiveness and Preferences on Mainstreaming Early Childhood Stimulation Services in Tanzania: A Case Study of Community-based Early Childhood Development Initiative

Ignas Lukanga
Department of Policy, Planning and Management, Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA), Tanzania
* Corresponding author
Suzana S. Nyanda
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA), Tanzania
DOI icon 10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.5.637

Read Counter
768

Downloads
445

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2023-03-22
Published 2023-09-27

Read counter = 768 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

Early childhood stimulation (ECS) services are globally championed due to their proven ability to help children at risk of developmental delay attain their developmental potential. This study explored the effect of different ways of mainstreaming ECS services on child development. A mixed research approach was employed, involving quantitative and qualitative collection methods. Quantitative data was collected using the adopted ZamCAT tool administered to 334 children sampled from the benefited households. Qualitative data was collected through focus group discussions with the parents (n=4) and in-depth interviews with the key informants (n=14), respectively. The collected quantitative data were coded and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (25), and the collected qualitative data were analysed through content analysis. The binary logistic regression model was employed where the results showed a significant effect on child development from home visiting (p = 0.01) and Early childhood development centres (p = 0.016) compared to clinic outreaches. Children's nutritional status was also an influencing factor for a child to attain optimal developmental status. Furthermore, both community members and ECS services providers highly preferred ECD centres and home visiting services as opposed to a preference for clinic outreaches. The study concludes that when children are subjected to ECS services, attaining optimal development potential regardless of the household background characteristics is the forecasted result. Therefore, the study underscores the capacitation of communities on ECS practices utilising the available enabling environment and increased budget allocation for developing specific ECD policies and deploying experts.

Keywords: clinic outreaches early childhood development centres early childhood stimulation home visit

References

  1. Aina, A. Y., & Bipath, K. (2022). Availability and use of infrastructural resources in promoting quality early childhood care and education in registered early childhood development centres. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 12(1), 1-11.
     Google Scholar
  2. Antelman, G., Ferla, J., Gill, M., Heather, H., Komba, T., Abubakar, A., & van de Ven, R. (2022). Effectiveness of an integrated community, facility and media-based early child development intervention on caregiver knowledge and behaviour: A quasi-experimental evaluation of the Malezi program in Tanzania. BMC Public Health, 23(19).
     Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, K. D. (1998). Methods of social science research. The Free Press.
     Google Scholar
  4. Balakrishnan, N., Theodore, C., Brian, E., Walter, P., Fabrizio, R., & Jozef, L. (2014). Wiley StatsRef: Statistics reference online || Cross-sectional design. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118445112.
     Google Scholar
  5. Berry, L., Dawes, A., & Biersteker, L. (2013). Getting the basics right: An essential package of services and support for Early Childhood Development. Children's Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/4089.
     Google Scholar
  6. Black, M. M., Walker, S. P., Fernald, L. C., Andersen, C. T., DiGirolamo, A. M., Lu, C., McCoy, D. C., Fink, G., Shawar, Y. R., & Shiffman, J. (2017). Advancing early childhood development: From science to scale 1: Early childhood development coming of age: Science through the life course. The Lancet, 389(10064), 77-90.
     Google Scholar
  7. Bowers, A. J., & Zhou, X. (2019). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC): A diagnostic measure for evaluating the accuracy of predictors of education outcomes. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 24(1), 20-46.
     Google Scholar
  8. Brentani, A., Walker, S., Chang-Lopez, S., Grisi, S., Powell, C., & Fink, G. (2021). A home visit-based early childhood stimulation programme in Brazil—a randomised controlled trial. Health Policy and Planning, 36(3), 288-297.
     Google Scholar
  9. Britto, P. R., Lye, S. J., Proulx, K., Yousafzai, A. K., Matthews, S. G., Vaivada, T., Perez-Escamilla, R., Rao, N., Ip, P., Fernald, L. C. H., MacMillan, H., Hanson, M., Wachs, T. D., Yao, H., Yoshikawa, H., Cerezo, A., Leckman, J. F., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2017). Nurturing care: promoting early childhood development. The Lancet, 389(10064), 91-102.
     Google Scholar
  10. Da Silva, E. V., Hartwig, F. P., Barros, F., & Murray, J. (2022). Effectiveness of a large-scale home visiting programme (PIM) on early child development in Brazil: quasi-experimental study nested in a birth cohort. BMJ Global Health, 7(1), e007116.
     Google Scholar
  11. Deoni, S., Dean, D., III, Joelson, S., O'Regan, J., & Schneider, N. (2018). Early nutrition influences developmental myelination and cognition in infants and young children. NeuroImage, 178, 649-659
     Google Scholar
  12. Dovel, K., Kalande, P., Udedi, E., Temelkovska, T., Hubbard, J., Mbalanga, C., Bruns, L., Mulungu, S., Gupta, S., Richter, L., & Coates, T. J. (2021). Integrated early childhood development services improve mothers' experiences with prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) programs in Malawi: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1).
     Google Scholar
  13. Duncan, G. J., Lee, K. T. H., Rosales-Rueda, M., & Kalil, A. (2018). Maternal age and child development. Demography, 55(6), 2229-2255.
     Google Scholar
  14. Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation-EGPAF. (2018). Integrated early childhood development services: The Tanzania experience (Technical brief). https://www.pedaids.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ECD-Tanzania-Brief.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  15. Felfe, C., & Lalive, R. (2018). Does early child care affect children's development? Journal of Public Economics, 159, 33-53.
     Google Scholar
  16. Ferguson, H. (2018). Making home visits: Creativity and the embodied practices of home visiting in social work and child protection. Qualitative Social Work, 17(1), 65-80.
     Google Scholar
  17. Fink, G., Matafwali, B., Moucheraud, C., & Zuilkowski, S. S. (2012). The Zambian Early Childhood Development Project: 2010 assessment final report (Report). https://www.comminit.com/content/zambian-early-childhood-development-project-2010-assessment-final-report.
     Google Scholar
  18. Gertler, P., Heckman, J., Pinto, R., Zanolini, A., Vermeersch, C., Walker, S., & Grantham-McGregor, S. (2014). Labor market returns to an early childhood stimulation intervention in Jamaica. Science, 344(6187), 998-1001.
     Google Scholar
  19. Gertler, P., Heckman, J. J., Pinto, R., Chang-Lopez, S. M., Grantham-McGregor, S., Vermeersch, C., Walker, S., & Wright, A. S. (2021). Effect of the Jamaica Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention on labor market outcomes at age 31 (Policy Research Working Paper No. w29292). The World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/105461633005046760/pdf/Effect-of-the-Jamaica-Early-Childhood-Stimulation-Intervention-on-Labor-Market-Outcomes-at-Age-31.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  20. Grantham-McGregor, S., Cheung, Y., Cueto, S., Glewwe, P., Richter, L., & Strupp, B. (2017). Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. The Lancet, 369, 60-70.
     Google Scholar
  21. Hamadani, J. D., Mehrin, S. F., Tofail, F., Hasan, M. I., Huda, S. N., Baker-Henningham, H., Ridout, D., & Grantham-McGregor, S. (2019). Integrating an early childhood development programme into Bangladeshi primary health-care services: an open-label, cluster-randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Global Health, 7(3), e366-e375.
     Google Scholar
  22. Hapunda, G., Kachama, M., & Wajala, S. (2021). Enabling effective community-based approaches to early childhood development: Endline evaluation report. Firelight Foundation.
     Google Scholar
  23. Jimoh, A. O., Anyiam, J. O., & Yakubu, A. M. (2018). Relationship between child development and nutritional status of under-five Nigerian children. South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 31(3), 50-54.
     Google Scholar
  24. Jukes, M. C., Mgonda, N. L., Tibenda, J. J., Gabrieli, P., Jeremiah, G., Betts, K. L., Williams, J., & Bub, K. L. (2021). Building an assessment of community‐defined social‐emotional competencies from the ground up in Tanzania. Child Development, 92(6), e1095-e1109.
     Google Scholar
  25. Knauer, H. A., Ozer, E. J., Dow, W. H., & Fernald, L. C. (2019). Parenting quality at two developmental periods in early childhood and their association with child development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 47, 396-404.
     Google Scholar
  26. Loizillon, A., Petrowski, N., Britto, P., & Cappa, c. (2017). Development of the Early Childhood Development Index in MICS surveys. MICS Methodological Papers, No. 6, Data and Analytics Section, Division of Data, Research and Policy, UNICEF New York.
     Google Scholar
  27. Marini, B. P. R., Lourenço, M. C., & Barba, P. C. D. S. D. (2017). Systematic literature review on models and practices of early childhood intervention in Brazil. Revista Paulista de Pediatria, 35, 456-463.
     Google Scholar
  28. Matafwali, B., & Serpell, R. (2014). Design and validation of assessment tests for young children in Zambia. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2014(146), 77–96.
     Google Scholar
  29. McAlpine, K., Mbise, A., & Kagucia, O. N. (2018). Opportunities to mitigate risk and protect young children in urban settlements in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Data visualization). https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/kate.mcalpine/viz/shared/2C3BF75F2.
     Google Scholar
  30. McCoy, D. C., Peet, E. D., Ezzati, M., Danaei, G., Black, M. M., Sudfeld, C. R., Fawzi, W., & Fink, G. (2016). Early childhood developmental status in low-and middle-income countries: National, regional, and global prevalence estimates using predictive modelling. PLoS Medicine, 13(6), e1002034.
     Google Scholar
  31. Minh, A., Muhajarine, N., Janus, M., Brownell, M., & Guhn, M. (2017). A review of neighbourhood effects and early child development: How, where, and for whom, do neighbourhoods matter?. Health & Place, 46, 155-174.
     Google Scholar
  32. Nair, S., Chandramohan, S., Sundaravathanam, N., Rajasekaran, A. B., & Sekhar, R. (2020). Father involvement in early childhood care: insights from a MEL system in a behaviour change intervention among rural Indian parents. Frontiers in Public Health, 8.
     Google Scholar
  33. Nandy, S., & Svedberg, P. (2012). The Composite Index of Anthropometric Failure (CIAF): An alternative indicator for malnutrition in young children. In V. R. Preedy (Ed.), Handbook of anthropometry: Physical measures of human form in health and disease (pp. 127-137). Springer.
     Google Scholar
  34. National Bureau of Statistics-NBS. (2013). 2012 population and housing census: Population distribution by administrative areas (Data). National Bureau of Statistics Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
     Google Scholar
  35. National Bureau of Statistics-NBS. (2017). National Panel Survey Wave 4 (Report). https://www.nbs.go.tz/nbs/takwimu/nps/NPS_Wave_4_2017.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  36. Ndugwa, N. (2019). Integrating psychosocial Early Childhood Development into reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health services in Uganda: Perceptions of governance stakeholders and primary healthcare providers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Queensland.
     Google Scholar
  37. Nešporová, O., & Janurová, K. (2018). Working fathers and childcare in the Czech Republic. In A. Santero & R. Musumeci (Eds.), Fathers, childcare and work: Volume 12 (pp. 103-128). Emerald Publishing Limited.
     Google Scholar
  38. Neuman, M. J., & Powers, S. (2021). Political prioritisation of early childhood education in low-and middle-income countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 86, 102458.
     Google Scholar
  39. Peacock, S., Konrad, S., Watson, E., Nickel, D., & Muhajarine, N. (2013). Effectiveness of home visiting programs on child outcomes: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 1-14.
     Google Scholar
  40. Prado-Galbarro, F.-J., Pérez-Ferrer, C., Ortigoza, A., López-Olmedo, N. P., Braverman-Bronstein, A., Rojas-Martínez, R., de Castro, F., & Barrientos-Gutiérrez, T. (2021). Early childhood development and urban environment in Mexico. PLOS ONE, 16(11), e0259946.
     Google Scholar
  41. Qadiri, F., & Manhas, S. (2009). Parental perception towards preschool education imparted at early childhood education centers. Studies on Home and Community Science, 3(1), 19-24.
     Google Scholar
  42. Redding, S. (2000). Parents and learning. International Academy of Education & International Bureau of Education.
     Google Scholar
  43. Rosenberg, S. A., Zhang, D., & Robinson, C. C. (2008). Prevalence of developmental delays and participation in early intervention services for young children. Pediatrics, 121(6), e1503-e1509.
     Google Scholar
  44. Ruel, M. T., Alderman, H., & Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. (2013). Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: How can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition? The Lancet, 382(9891), 536-551.
     Google Scholar
  45. Russell, A. L., Hentschel, E., Fulcher, I., Ravà, M. S., Abdulkarim, G., Abdalla, O., & Wilson, K. (2022). Caregiver parenting practices, dietary diversity knowledge, and association with early childhood development outcomes among children aged 18-29 months in Zanzibar, Tanzania: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1-14.
     Google Scholar
  46. Sang, C. C. (2016). Level of parental involvement in the provision of education in public early childhood and development education centres in Njoro Sub-County, Nakuru County, Kenya (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Moi University.
     Google Scholar
  47. Shukia, R., & Messo, I. (2018). Early childhood care in Tanzania: Experiences of mothers working in the informal sector in high-density urban areas. Early Child Development and Care, 190(11), 1738-1749.
     Google Scholar
  48. Sightsavers. (2015). What are the Sustainable Development Goals?. Sightsavers. https://www.sightsavers.org/policy-and-advocacy/global-goals/?.
     Google Scholar
  49. Tekin, A. K. (2019). How to achieve quality early childhood education for all: Goal 4 of the United Nations Sustainable Development. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 3(1), 71-80.
     Google Scholar
  50. UNICEF. (2014). The formative years: UNICEF’s work on measuring early childhood development (Report). https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Formative-Years-ECD-Brochure-EN.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  51. UNICEF. (2017). Measuring early learning and quality outcomes (MELQO) Zanzibar (Report). https://www.unicef.org/tanzania/media/1836/file/Measuring%20Early%20Learning%20and%20Quality%20Outcomes%20(MELQO)%20.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  52. Urke, H. B., Contreras, M., & Matanda, D. J. (2018). The influence of maternal and household resources, and parental psychosocial child stimulation on early childhood development: A cross-sectional study of children 36–59 months in Honduras. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(926), 1-10.
     Google Scholar
  53. URT. (2014). Tanzania National Nutrition Survey Final Report (Report). Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
     Google Scholar
  54. URT. (2018). Tanzania National Nutrition Survey. Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
     Google Scholar
  55. URT. (2021). National Multi-sectoral Early Childhood Development Program (Report). https://www.tecden.or.tz/uploads/NATIONAL_MULTI-SECTORAL_EARLY_CHILDHOOD_DEVELOPMENT_PROGRAMME_(NM-ECDP)_2022_-_2026.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  56. Walker, S., Chang, S. M., Smith, J. A., & Baker-Henningham, H. (2018). The reach up early childhood parenting program: Origins, content and implementation. ZERO TO THREE, 38(4), 37-43.
     Google Scholar
  57. WHO. (2012). Care for child development: improving the care of young children (Report). https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/103991/retrieve.
     Google Scholar
  58. WHO. (2018). Nurturing care for early childhood development: A framework for helping children survive and thrive to transform health and human potential (Report). https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272603/9789241514064-eng.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  59. World Bank. (2018a). Overview of early stimulation interventions and research in Tanzania (Report). https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/953191594674184349-0090022020/original/TF0A6214Tanzania203.EarlystimulationmappingSept2018forposting.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  60. World Bank. (2018b). Early childhood stimulation in Tanzania: Findings from a pilot study in Katavi Region (Report). https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstreams/3af37b15-e878-59b5-90a3-d5b70af16a8a/download.
     Google Scholar
  61. Xiong, X., Deng, L., & Li, H. (2020). Is winning at the start important: Early childhood family cognitive stimulation and child development. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105431.
     Google Scholar