Repertoire Selection Processes of Basic School Marching Band Instructors in Ghana
Article Main Content
The purpose of this study was to investigate into the repertoire selection practices of Basic school marching band instructors in Ghana. Questionnaire and semi-structured interview guide designed for the collection of data obtained demographic information and identified the criteria and procedures used by basic school band directors in selecting repertoire for their bands. An instrumental case study design allowed me to gain an in-depth understanding of band instructors’ perspectives. Data were solicited from 26 school band directors selected using snowball sampling method. Of the 26 directors invited to participate, all agreed to do so and actually responded to all questions. Results revealed that the three most frequently reported sources of repertoire selection were other band experiences, recommendations from colleagues, and school ensemble participation. The three factors most frequently reported as affecting repertoire selection decisions were the appeal of the music to self, appeal of the music to colleagues, the audience appeal to the music, and students’ appeal to music. Recommendations drawn from the research findings included the following: repertoire for school band methods and wind literature classes needs to be more adequately addressed, and school band instructors in Ghana should focus more on ‘quality’ and consider the human subjective elements as alternatives.
References
-
Volk, T. (2007). Charts and other paraphernalia. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55(4), 302-312.
Google Scholar
1
-
Forbes, G. (2001). The repertoire selection practices of high school choral directors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(2), 102-121.
Google Scholar
2
-
Hayward, C. M. (2004). A course in band literature based on a standard repertoire developed from the opinions of selected collegiate and secondary school band directors (Doctoral dissertation), Ohio State University, USA.
Google Scholar
3
-
Reynolds, H. R. (2000). Repertoire is the curriculum. Music Educators Journal, 87(1), 31-33.
Google Scholar
4
-
Weller, T. (2014). Choosing repertoire for middle school band: what important criteria should factor into the selection of your band literature? Teaching Music, 21(4), 26-29.
Google Scholar
5
-
Apfelstadt, H. (2000). First things first. Music Educators Journal, 87(1). 19-22.
Google Scholar
6
-
Hoffer, C. R. (2001). Teaching music in the secondary schools (5th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Google Scholar
7
-
Persellin, D. (2000). The importance of high quality literature. Music Educators Journal, 87(11), 17-18.
Google Scholar
8
-
Berenson, G. (2008). In unison: A new school year - new repertoire challenges! American Music Teacher, 58(1), 4-5.
Google Scholar
9
-
Music Educators National Conference. (1994). National standards for arts education. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
Google Scholar
10
-
Chen, Y. (2018). An Investigation of Middle School Music Teachers’ Rationale and Procedure Relating to Instrumental (Band) Repertoire Selection in Southern Ontario: A Case Study (Masters Theses), University of Windsor, Ontario-Canada.
Google Scholar
11
-
Miller, J. L. (2013). An evaluation of quality in compositions for school band (Grades III and IV): A regional study (Doctoral dissertation), Florida State University, USA.
Google Scholar
12
-
O’Reilly, J., & Williams, M. (1998). Standards for judging young band music. The Instrumentalist, 52(12), 12-15.
Google Scholar
13
-
Gage, S. L. (2000). The importance of repertoire selection for the band director. National Band Association Journal. 41(2), 11-14.
Google Scholar
14
-
Mayhall, B. (1994). The quest for high quality repertoire. Choral Journal. 35(2), 9-15.
Google Scholar
15
-
Gregory, M. D. (1986). A descriptive analysis of factors which contribute to job dissatisfaction among secondary school band directors. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(1), 23-94.
Google Scholar
16
-
Labuta, J. (1997). Teaching musicianship in the high school band. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Meredith Music Publications.
Google Scholar
17
-
Coutts, L. (2018). Selecting motivating repertoire for adult piano students: A transformative pedagogical approach. British Journal of Music Education, 35(3), 285-299.
Google Scholar
18
-
Knight, J. (2001). A gathering of composers for middle school band. The Instrumentalist, 55(12), 14-20.
Google Scholar
19
-
Leonhard, C., & House, R. W. (1972). Foundations and principles of music education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
20
-
Roseboom, J. D. (2006). Criteria for curricular literature selection among Florida band directors (Doctoral dissertation), Florida State University, USA.
Google Scholar
21
-
Reimer, B. (1989). A philosophy of music education (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
22
-
Budiansky & Foley, 2005
Google Scholar
23
-
Geraldi, K. M. (2008). Planned programming pays dividends. Music Educators Journal, 95(2), 75-79.
Google Scholar
24
-
Hopkins, M. (2013). Programming in the zone: Repertoire selection for the large ensemble. Music Educators Journal, 23(7), 69-74.
Google Scholar
25
-
Forrester, S. H. (2017). Repertoire selection for concert band: Preservice music teachers’ perceptions and development of knowledge. Research Perspectives in Music Education, 19(1), 14-31.
Google Scholar
26
-
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.
Google Scholar
27
-
Dordzro, J. D. (2017). Impact of Ghanaian Basic School Band Directors’ rehearsal strategies on Students’ performance (Doctoral Dissertation), University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Google Scholar
28
-
Dordzro, J.-D. (2019). An exploration of Ghanaian basic school marching band pupils’ instrument choices. Journal of African Arts & Culture, 3(3), 25 – 50.
Google Scholar
29
-
Harrison, S. (2010). Boys on the Outer: Themes in Male Engagement with Music. Thymos: Journal of Boyhood Studies, 4(1), 39-53.
Google Scholar
30
-
Green, L. (1997). Music, gender, education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
31
-
Jordan, M. (2006). 10X the talent = 1/3 of the credit: How female musicians are treated differently in music (Masters Theses), University of Central Florida, Orlando- Florida.
Google Scholar
32
-
Dahl, L. (1984). Stormy Weather: The music and lives of a century of jazz women. New York: Pantheon Books.
Google Scholar
33
-
Tucker, S. (2002). Women. In B. D. Kernfeld (Ed.), The new Grove dictionary of jazz, Vol. 3 (2nd Ed), (pp. 978-984). New York: Grove’s Dictionaries.
Google Scholar
34
-
Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
35
-
Woodford, P. G. (2002). The social construction of music teacher identity in undergraduate music education majors. In R. Colwell & C. Richardson (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 675–694). New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
36
-
Sandholtz, J., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
37
-
Maddux, C. D., Johnson, D. L., & Willis, J. (2001). Educational computing: Learning with tomorrow’s technologies (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Google Scholar
38
-
Ballantyne, J. (2006). Reconceptualising preservice teacher education courses for music teachers: The importance of pedagogical content knowledge and skills and professional knowledge and skills. Research Studies in Music Education, 26(37), 37-50.
Google Scholar
39
-
Haston, W., & Leon-Guerrero, A. L. (2008). Sources of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 17(2), 48-59.
Google Scholar
40
-
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(2), 88-99.
Google Scholar
41